Wednesday, September 2, 2020

Google vs. Yahoo Web Browsers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Google versus Hurray Web Browsers - Essay Example Both these internet browsers have a gigantic portfolio for their clients. Lets think about a portion of the administrations offered by both these web mammoths. (Luke, 2005)Yahoo gatherings are progressively mainstream when contrasted with google bunches mostly in light of the fact that yahoo has been in the market for a more drawn out time. The gatherings are handily framed and sends are sent either as a condensation or individually.Google altered the mailing methodology by presenting immense inbox size which is currently upto more that 6 GBs. Yippee offers a lower limit anyway news is circling that a boundless inbox size for the clients is in the works.As referenced over, Google's place of separation is the complex algorithims utilized in their web indexes for neighborhood look, picture searches and web look. Hurray doesn't have that much fire-power yet it despite everything is a famous decision for some.Yahoo gives road maps and driving bearings for US urban communities as it were. The Google maps are incredibly various as they are equipped for giving business areas, contact data, and driving headings for enormous urban communities of the world.Google's person to person communication site, Orkut is a well known decision for some Asians and clients in Southern America. This notoriety has been as of late squashed by the boundlessness of Facebook which has vanquished the greater part of the landmasses. Hurray's 360* was rarely well known it despite everything hasn't got on as Orkut had. Others There is a rundown of different administrations, for example, web based shopping, news, alarms, answers and so forth that are accessible with both Google and Yahoo and very little contrasts are there in these administrations. Interface, Design, and Layout When looking at two significant site programs, it is imperative to think about their interface, plan and design from the assessment perspective just as ease of use perspective. A decent site must contain valuable substance that is easy to grasp, adaptable for utilization of numerous innovations and steady with simple exploring capacity. (Collins, 2006) Google has an extremely perfect and basic UI with the first page just containing the inquiry bar and connections on the top. Then again Yahoo's! page is confused with data, connections and needs center. Clients for the most part like straightforward and straightforward destinations and Google's rearranged interface implies that individuals of all ages and expertise will have the option to get to their site. Notices Publicizing is essential for sites particularly for sites like Google and Yahoo! that offer free administrations to their clients. This is their principle wellspring of income. At the point when the site opens up, Google presents just the administrations with no commercials. Yippee lines up its notices on the first page which is an irritation esteem for the clients. In that capacity, it is essential to evade promotions however much as could reasonably be expected. Ads are amazingly disagreeable with the clients as they are totally pointless for the vast majority. Despite the fact that both Google and Yahoo! are text-based locales, Yahoo's ads are a wellspring of client aggravation. Consistency Another trait of a decent internet browser site is the consistency in the structure. As referenced above, there are a ton of comparable administrations offered by both Yahoo! furthermore, Google. Anyway the structure of the administrations is surprisingly unique. Like the first page, Google is reliable with the base content on the page with sufficiently only to enable the client to comprehend and appreciate it. This has the impact of consistency and consistency, while Yahoo! saves various designs for every one of its administrations page. Despite the fact that each assistance has a connection

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Personality and Memory essays

Character and Memory papers What establishes a human isn't just given. It is likewise made by us. (Kennan Malik) The memory influences our character in light of the fact that our memory, the psychological capacity of reviewing past encounters (, structures from our condition, which makes our attributes and conduct create or modify, in this way, influencing our character. Character is the entirety of the examples of reasoning, feeling, and carrying on that are qualities of an individual. Anyway while depicting someones character they are frequently alluding to the distinction of the degree of attributes we have. We as a whole have similar qualities; the main contrast is that every one of us has an alternate degree of every characteristic. (Pervin, Lawrence An.) A model would be that if two kids, Jack and Jill, were playing with a toy and you removed the toy. Jack may begin to holler and cry and Jill may very well make a mean face, get another toy, and begin to play with it. Jack would have ind icated significant levels of forcefulness, and Jill would have demonstrated low degrees of forcefulness, despite the fact that the two qualities were obvious. In spite of the fact that everybody has a one of a kind character, we as a whole have similar characteristics, simply various degrees of each. Nature and inherited methods are principally the two factors that add to building up a people character. (Pervin, Lawrence A.) The domain comprises of individuals, encounters, circumstances and spots. An adjustment in character can be a reason for a physical or mental issue, for example, dementias related with Alzheimer's, AIDS, strokes, a cerebrum tumor or head injury, liquor or medication misuse, unfriendly impacts of prescriptions or, melancholy, an awful accident, and different pressure related issues. ( The character is the manner in which we act, think and feel as a result of the various degrees of characteristics that have been gained through nature or through genetic methods. ... <!

Friday, August 21, 2020

Essay --

Presentation: In light of five standards of Canada Health Act, Government of Canada presented national medicinal services framework in 1962. Canadian government was resolved to give widespread and far reaching social insurance administration that is available by every single lasting occupant without limitation dependent on ones’ salary. Canada’s human services framework is mutually financed by the administrative and the commonplace government with concentrated rules built up by the government to guarantee uniform social insurance benefits the nation over. Canada spent around $211 billion on human services in 2013 with a normal of $5,988 per individual (CIHI, 2001). Medicinal services spending keeps on rising and is relied upon to be half of Ontario’s absolute yearly spending in not so distant future. About 70% of Canada’s medicinal services cost is publically financed and just 30% is supported by medical coverage and cash based costs (Toronto Sun, 2013). Late Angus Reid study has uncovered that the Canadian social insurance framework is attempting to offer acceptable types of assistance to its residents. It was uncovered that 187,000 patients were holding back to get treatment and 45% of those in the holding up line described themselves as â€Å"in pain† (Health Canada, 2005). Holding up lines are normal across Canada, for example, holding up period between essential discussion and medical procedure is 10.2 weeks in Ontario and 17.1 weeks in Saskatchewan. Because of increment in Demand and maturing populace, holding up lines have developed by over 5 weeks since 1967 (Gratzer, 2001). The circumstance in Ontario and Quebec are more cut off contrasted with different regions in Canada. In February 1999, interest for human services arrived at a point where it surpass flexibly and Ontario medicinal services needed to organize disease treatment in United States. Angus Reid survey... ... clinical administrations are said to be free however very few are accessible without holding up lines. Numerous issues looked by Canada’s current human services framework can be tended to by presenting an equal private and open social insurance framework. So as to present a two-level human services framework, changes to Canada Health Act at both government and common levels are required. It has been presumed that usage of two-level social insurance framework is most extreme significant as it will be hard for the legislature to continue medicinal services financing in future. Two-level social insurance framework will give productive medicinal services framework as holding up lines will be diminished, government spending will be controlled, private segment will give access to present day innovation just as urge Canadian doctors to rehearse in Canada as opposed to moving to United States for higher money related motivators.

Saturday, May 30, 2020

Mass Incarceration Parallels with Jim Crow - Literature Essay Samples

Mass incarceration has not only emerged as a racialized form of social control fueled by politician’s strategies to gain political status, but has perpetuated a national epidemic characterized by unequal civil liberties and an endless cycle of crime. This cannot be stopped until American’s accept the severe reality of the situation and drug laws and law enforcement policies are radically changed. Michelle Alexander further explains this phenomenon in her book The New Jim Crow. Alexander argues that mass incarceration in the United States was developed primarily as a form of social control and identifies the War on Drugs as the main cause. The general public assumption is that the War on Drugs was launched in response to the crisis caused by crack cocaine in inner city neighborhoods. This view furthers the idea that the racial disparities seen in drug convictions and sentences, which are disproportional to blacks and Hispanics (Tonry 2016, 4), as well as the rapid growth in prison population, are simply a reflection of the government’s efforts to combat drug crime in poor, minority neighborhoods (Alexander 2016, 7). Alexander however, declares that this is wrong. In the 1960s, the social, political, and economic pressures felt by both Northern and Southern whites after the Second Great Migration of blacks from the rural South to the urban North and from the civil rights movement were not only still present, but were intensified with the increase in crime rates (Travis, Western and Redburn 2014, 109). Political leaders of northern cities called for more law enforcement power in response to the rising crime rates and for poor blacks to have greater rights in the cities to which they migrated. In response, President Johnson launched the â€Å"War on Crime† that not only expanded the role of federal government in state and local crime policy, but sought out to address poverty, which he believed was the â€Å"root cause† of crime. His approach was known as the Great Society (1964-1965) and was a set of policies that aimed to eliminate poverty and racial injustice through investing more in education, health, welfare, and other social and economic problems, outside of law enforcement. However, when this approach failed, liberals and conservatives alike, agreed that there was a need to â€Å"[modernize, professionalize, and federalize]† the criminal justice system in order to combat the crime problem (Travis, Western and Redburn 2014, 110). In the 1970s, President Nixon similarly added to this ideal with the â€Å"southern strategy† which rested on politicizing the crime issue in a racially coded manner. In order to gain support among southern voters, Nixon claimed that â€Å"the whole problem [was] really the blacks† and that personal and cultural short comings, such as lack of work ethic, poor parenting practices, and reliance public assistance and social programs, were major sources of the rise in disorder and violence (Travis, Western, and Redburn 2014, 116-117). Thus, the War on Drugs was launched to target the poor individuals in inner cities that in the governments minds lacked certain personal and cultural qualities and were a social burden on society. This further supports Alexanders claim that while the 1980s and 1990s publicity surrounding the crack cocaine epidemic led to dramatic increase in funding for the drug war and increase in sentencing policies of those convicted of crack cocaine use, t here is no notion that the War on Drugs was launched in response to crack cocaine. In fact, President Raegan officially declared the War on Drugs in 1982, years before there was much media coverage on the crisis of crack cocaine in poor black neighborhoods. Consequently, the War on Drugs arose not to combat drugs, but as a political strategy that won over both northerners and southerners, liberals and conservatives, and blacks and whites alike to seem â€Å"tough on crime† (Kirby and Szuberla 2006). An important factor when addressing the War on Drugs in relation to mass incarceration is the role of the police and the courts. There are few legal rules that constrain the police when it comes to drugs. Alexander argues that there exists a â€Å"virtual drug exception to the Bill of Rights† (Alexander 2016, 63-64) The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, and papers against unreasonable searches or seizes without warrants or probable cause, however in Terry v. Ohio (1968), the Supreme Court ruled that as long as a police officer has reasonable suspicion that someone is engaged in criminal activity and dangerous then it is constitutionally permissible to stop, question, and search him/her (Alexander 2016, 63-64). The Fourth Amendment is just one example of the civil liberties that have been undermined by the drug war. Another consequence of mass incarceration is that it has little effect on actually decreasing the crime rate. Not only do prisons allow criminals to create a crime network with one another, but after being released that Alexander mentions, individuals are often confined to very poverty stricken areas with high criminal activity (Currie 2016, 84). These areas commonly exhibit activities, like a thriving drug trade, lots of guns, and the presence of many other people in the exact same situation, that can greatly increase the risk of the individual being pulled back into crime (Currie 2016, 84). Those who have strong economic and social opportunities are unlikely to commit crimes regardless of the penalty, while those who go to prison are far more likely to commit crimes again in the future (Tonry 2016). Although, Alexander acknowledges that the development the War on Drugs, and in effect mass incarceration, has long throughout history just been a political strategy for politicians to say they â€Å"tough on crime,† (Kirby and Szuberla 2006) she also argues that it was created as a form of social control directed towards African Americans. Alexander’s most compelling, and perhaps strongest statement, in her book is that â€Å"mass incarceration in the US [has], in fact emerged as a stunningly comprehensive and well-disguised system of racialized social control that functions in a manner strikingly similar to Jim Crow† (Alexander 2016, 4). While this idea is extremely unsettling, Alexander successfully draws parallels between the old and â€Å"new† Jim Crow and supports her claim to emphasize the severity of the problem in the American criminal justice and prison system. Historically, the segregation laws of Jim Crow emerged as strategic way for white elites to gain political and economic power and deflect the anger and hostility they were faced with onto African Americans. The modern American system not only similarly developed as a way for politicians to gain status, but also as a form of racial segregation. In 2008, 45% of the racial disparities in imprisonment for all offense could not be explained by arrests, or in other words, the idea that the disparities existed only because African Americans were committing more crimes was not justifiable (Travis, Western, and Redburn 2014, 95). This means that there is an extraordinary percentage of black people in prisons all over the United States when compared to whites, segregating them from main stream society. An extraordinary percentage of black people in the United States also have a â€Å"prisons label† and face restrictions in education, employment, housing, public benefits, and the right t o vote, because they are an incarcerated individual (Alexander 2016, 2 191-192). Due to these legal discriminations, are constrained to ghetto communities characterized by extreme disadvantages, such as limited health care, poor social services, inadequate schools, and few stores (Currie 2016, 84). The lack of these liberties not only affects the individual incarcerated, but can have massive consequences on their families and their communities as a whole by taking away potential sources of economic and social support and parental guidance, making it difficult for children to find a path out of poverty (Currie 2016, 83-84). Another incredible similarity between the old and new Jim Crow that Alexander identifies is that both have served to define the meaning and significance of race is American society. Slavery defined being black as being a slave, Jim Crow defined it as being a second-class citizen, and today’s mass incarceration defines it as being a criminal (Alexander 2016, 197-200). Therefore, racism in the United States has not been â€Å"abolished† it has merely been redesigned it. Malcom X, a human rights activist, also acknowledged this phenomenon when he said â€Å"Racism is like a Cadillac. They bring out a new model every year.† Every racial caste system in the United States, although vastly different from one another, has developed a stigma that negatively defines what it means to be black. Today, Americans live in the â€Å"age of colorblindness,† as Alexander describes it, where there is an absence of outward racial hostility and â€Å"nearly [everyone] has a g enuine commitment to basic racial equality in the public sphere† (Travis, Western, and Redburn 2014, 99). Therefore, Alexander argues that the modern criminal justice system is just the new â€Å"model† of racism that has been designed to fit in with the changing times. Just as Alexander draws a detailed analysis of the causes, consequences, and problems of mass incarceration, she also describes proposed methods on how to fix them. She argues that impressive changes in drugs laws need to be made in order to combat the â€Å"poverty, chronic unemployment, broken families, and crime† that the War on Drugs, and also subsequently mass incarceration, creates rather than destroys (Alexander 2016, 237). Locking up many drug users and dealers has almost no preventative effects, as they are often minor participants in a much larger, more complex market, and actually provides a â€Å"school [of] crime† for these incoming offenders to connect with more advanced and hardened criminals (Tonry 2016, 14-16). While this War on Drugs could easily be changed by creating new policies, such as the decriminalization of marijuana, without any regard to race, the prevailing caste system cannot successfully be fully destroyed with a race-neutral approach (Alexander 2016, 239). Since the United States imprisons a larger percentage of its black population than South Africa did at the height of apartheid (Alexander 2016, 6), Alexander argues that Americans have to â€Å"resist the temptation of colorblind advocacy† and discuss race openly and honestly (Alexander 2016, 238). Americans must openly admit that â€Å"it was because of race that [they] didn’t care much about what happened to ‘those people’† and only then can meaningful changes be made to law enforcement policies, such as Terry v. Ohio (1968) and United States v. Matinez-Fuerte (1976), that obstruct basic civil rights and make mass incarceration immunized from claims of racial bias (Alexander 2016, 39). What Alexander fails to mention in her analysis of mass incarceration is the vast number of whites, who are also being incarcerated at rates unprecedented in any other country in the modern world. The United States has imprisonment rates four to twelve times those of the other developed countries (Tonry 2011, 9) so not all can be achieved in addressing this as solely a politically and socially driven race issue. While it is true that black males in the United States are incarcerated at rates higher than white males, 4,749 people per 100,000 people versus 708 people per 100,000 people, these are both still rates much higher than the next country on the incarceration leader board, Russia at 568 people per 100,000 people (black and white combined) (Gottschalk 2015, 5). Alexander acknowledges that many whites are incarcerated, but writes it off as collateral damage. In doing so, she misses many of the other factors outside of â€Å"colorblind† drug laws and law enforcement policie s that drive mass incarceration, including, but not limited to, economic factors. The most predominant economic factor is the idea of a prison-industrial complex which explains how the government and industries use imprisonment as solutions to economic problems. The film â€Å"Up the Ridge,† a documentary that aimed to address the injustices of the America prison system, exploited this idea perfectly as it showed the development of a prison town in Big Stone Gap, Virginia (Kirby and Szuberla 2006). Wallen’s Ridge State Prison was built when the town faced a major economic depression after a mining company that employed majority of the community close down. Soon nearly the entire town became dependent on it for jobs and companies in the area became dependent on it for revenue (Kirby and Szuberla 2006). While it is clear African Americans have been, and remain, the central targets of the criminal justice system, many members of other groups are finding themselves â€Å"economically and politically disenfranchised and socially marginalized† (Gottschalk 2015, 11) by the expansion of the system. It is important to recognize that this system, although first and most importantly created as a political project, and not an economic project, has become a powerful industrial business with close political allies (Gottschalk 2015, 77). Without taking these two key factors into account, Alexander’s proposed solutions will not fully solve the problem of mass incarceration. Michelle Alexander successfully draws extremely unsettling parallels between the causes and consequences of the modern-day American criminal justice and prison system and Jim Crow while emphasizing the importance of making both political and social change in order to combat the War on Drugs and the new age of â€Å"colorblind racism† that America faces today. Her analysis, however, lacks acknowledgment of the high imprisonment rates of white people, as well as blacks people, and the economic factors that play into mass incarceration. In omitting these parts of the problem, Alexander’s proposed solutions will not full address the problem. Works Cited Alexander, Michelle. 2016. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, rev. ed. NY: The New Press. Currie, Elliot. 2016. The Roots of Danger: Violent Crime in a Global Perspective. NY: Oxford University Press. Gottschalk, Marie. 2015. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Kirby, Amelia and Szuberla, Nick, dirs. 2006. Up the Ridge. Whitesburg, Kentucky: Appalshop. Tonry, Michael. 2011. â€Å"Punishment, Policies and Patterns in Western Countries,† in Michael Tonry and Richard S. Frase, eds. Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. NY: Oxford University Press. Tonry, Micheal. 2016. Sentencing Fragments: Penal reform in America, 1975-2025. NY: Oxford University Press. Travis, Jeremy; Wester, Bruce; and Redburn, Steve, eds. 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Saturday, May 16, 2020

Scottish Independence and the United Kingdom

There are eight accepted criteria that determine whether an entity is an independent country or state. An entity need only fail on one of the eight criteria to fall short of the definition of an independent country. Scotland does not meet six of the eight criteria. Criteria Defining an Independent Country Heres how Scotland measures upon the criteria that define an independent country or state. Space  or  Territory  With  Internationally  Recognized  Boundaries Boundary  disputes are OK. Scotland does have internationally recognized boundaries and an area of 78,133 square kilometers. People  Live  There  on  an  Ongoing  Basis According to the 2001 census, Scotlands population is 5,062,011. Economic  Activity  and  an  Organized  Economy This also means a country  regulates  foreign  and  domestic  trade  and  issues money. Scotland certainly has economic activity and an organized economy; Scotland even has its own GDP (over 62 billion pounds sterling as of 1998). However, Scotland does not regulate foreign or domestic trade, and the Scottish Parliament is not authorized to do so. Under the terms of the Scotland Act 1998, the Scottish Parliament is able to pass laws on a range of issues known as devolved issues. The United Kingdom Parliament is able to act on reserved issues. Reserved issues include a variety of economic issues: the fiscal, economic and monetary system; energy; common markets; and traditions. The Bank of Scotland does issue money, but it prints the British pound on behalf of the central government. The Power of Social Engineering, Such As Education The Scottish Parliament is able to control education, training, and social work (but not social security). However, this power was granted to Scotland by U.K. Parliament. Transportation System for Moving Goods and People Scotland itself has a transportation system, but the system is not fully under Scottish control. The Scottish Parliament controls some aspects of transportation, including the Scottish road network, bus policy, and ports and harbors, while the U.K. Parliament controls railways, transport safety,  and regulation. Again, Scotlands power was granted by the U.K. Parliament. Government That Provides Public Services and Police Power The Scottish Parliament has the ability to control law and home affairs (including most aspects of criminal and civil law, the prosecution system, and the courts) as well as the police and fire services. The U.K. Parliament controls defense and national security across the United Kingdom. Again, Scotlands power was granted to Scotland by the U.K. Parliament. Sovereignty: No Other State Has Power Over the Country's Territory Scotland does not have sovereignty. The U.K. Parliament definitely has power over Scotlands territory. External  Recognition, "Voted Into the Club" by Other Countries Scotland does not have external recognition, nor does Scotland have its own embassies in other independent countries. The Verdict As you can see, Scotland is not an independent country or state, and neither are Wales, Northern Ireland, or England itself. However, Scotland is most certainly a nation of people living in an internal division of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Fast Food Franchising Company And Corporation - 1342 Words

McDonald’s is a very well-known fast food franchising company and corporation. The company was first established in 1940 by brothers Richard and Maurice McDonald. Surprisingly the restaurant was not named â€Å"McDonalds† from the beginning, it was actually named â€Å"McDonald’s Bar-B-Q† and it held many menu items, but mostly barbecue. After eight years of selling their menu, the brothers noticed hamburgers were their bestselling item. It was at that time, in 1948, that the McDonald brothers closed down their small car hop to open a burger stand with a streamlined system. They renamed their burger stand â€Å"McDonalds† and that became the start of its journey to become the biggest global fast food chain. In 1955, a man by the name of Ray Kroc†¦show more content†¦In 1967, McDonald’s opened the first international franchise and by 1992 had restaurants on six continents (James p.2). As of 2014, McDonald’s has over 30,000 restaurants globally and they employ over 1 million people. McDonald’s corporate office and global headquarters is located in Oak Brook, Illinois. The company has taken the title of the world’s largest fast food chain and has the profits that show it. In 2012 alone the fast food industry had total revenue of 190.1 billion dollars. In the same year McDonald’s had total revenue of 35,600 million, which is over twice as much as the second most profitable company, subway, which had total revenue of 12,100 million. The reason the company make so much more profit than other chains lies in their business model and the company’s involvement in real estate. In order to understand the company’s involvement in real estate, one must go back to the company’s beginnings. In 1956 Ray Kroc was having a hard time making his franchised restaurants profitable, he was not able to acquire the funds to pay both the bui lding of the restaurant and to pay for the land the restaurants would be built on. It was only after Harry J Sonneborn was hired and approached to Kroc with an idea to bring McDonald’s into the real estate business. Soon after, the Franchise Realty Corporation was established. The purpose was not only to buy and sell properties, but also to

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Workplace Conflicts for Interests and Principles -myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theWorkplace Conflicts for Interests and Principles. Answer: Introduction Workplace conflict or organizational conflict is a very common issue in the business world. Due to the conflicts, the sometimes the organizations get benefitted and sometimes they get affected. Workplace conflict is a situation of disharmony, generated from the real or supposed opposition of requirements, interests and principles among the people working together (Sonnentag, Unger and Ngel 2013). The conflict takes many forms in different organizations. Clash is always inevitable between the formal authority and management and the subordinate employees. The subject for conflict also varies in different organizations. Differences in the ideology, points of view and unhealthy competition can result in conflicts in the workplace (Katz and Flynn 2013). The positive and negative impacts of the workplace conflict and the ways to resolve them are explained in the following discussion. Discussion Workplace conflicts are classified in the following types, Personal, Intragroup and Intergroup. Power, work style and personality clash results in personal conflicts. Intragroup conflicts arise due to lack of freedom, resources and position. Some people prefer to work independently and when confronts with interdependence within a group, conflicts occur. Lastly, intergroup conflicts arise horizontally and vertically. Conflicts and competition between the functions result in horizontal clash, and competition between hierarchical levels result in vertical clash (Goetsch and Davis 2014). Same situations can result in both positive and negative impacts, depending on the way of handling it and attitude of the people involved in it. Positive impacts Conflicts often influence the change in the organizations, especially in the small businesses. Due to workplace conflicts, organizations often are forced to modify the operation procedures and policies and design and implement new ones. Extreme conflict within the organization can lead to complete change of the leadership and management positions and new people come with new ideas (Demsky, Ellis and Fritz 2014). Competition is an outcome of workplace conflict. When employees try to outdo each other to achieve the goals that benefit the organization, healthy competitions occur and it is a positive effect of conflicts. For example, when two sales people compete to increase their sales target to get more incentives, it also helps the company to earn more revenues. It also helps to bring in motivation among the other employees (Meier et al. 2013). conflicts often bring in creativity in the organizational operations and objectives. When people with good and creative ideas come together and argue to establish their points, in most cases a creative solution comes up and that motivate the employees. When the motivation comes through conflict, that pushes the productivity level of people to the maximum. Hence, healthy conflict is always welcome by the organizations (Gilin Oore, Leiter and LeBlanc 2015). Negative impacts Personal issues and emotions often create negative conflict in the workplace. In many cases, the higher authority often put forward their power and position for controlling the subordinates and peers. When a person misuses his power for any personal conflict then it is a negative impact of the workplace conflict (Moore 2014). Due to intragroup and intergroup conflicts, sometimes the optimum output is not achieved. Organizational goals are compromised to achieve the goals of the groups. Thus, sub-optimization arises. The clash of the groups to become superior often leads to unnecessary conflicts and competition becomes unhealthy. Conflicts often result in wastage of precious resources, time and reputation of the company. Employees often waste their time and efforts by involving in the conflicts rather than meeting the goals. Hence, time and resources both are wasted and it also creates a negative image of the company in the business world (Meier et al. 2013). Ways to resolve workplace conflicts In simple terms, conflict is disagreement between people on various issues. Often the leadership and workplace conflicts are related. An efficient leadership is necessary to resolve the conflicts in the organization. Since, conflicts cannot be avoided, hence, it is rational and sensible to accept the conflict and find out a solution by properly mitigating the negative impacts and embracing the positive impacts. Hence, leaders play a very important role in resolving the conflicts. Manipulative people exist in every organization, who create conflicts by using emotions to cover up their lack of quality. A strong leader can only reduce such conflicts through efficient leadership and motivational skills (Myatt 2012). The effective ways to handle conflicts are as follows: Defining acceptable behavior: An organization must define the acceptable behavior and norms beforehand, and penalties for failing to comply with those. A well defined norm and effective communication can help in resolving the conflicts. Conflict prevention: Finding out the areas for potential conflict can help the company to prevent the possible conflicts. It needs efficient management and leadership to find out the possible reasons of a potential conflict and resolving them beforehand. Still, if the conflict does arise, the severity can be reduced quickly in this way (Goetsch and Davis 2014). Understanding of the gains of the people: Conflicts often arise due to the issue on personal gains. It is important to understand the motivational factors for the people and help them achieving their goals. This way personal conflict can be handled. Importance factor: The management must understand the importance of the issue of conflict or potential conflict and should address it accordingly. It should not neglect any important issue and must handle it with utmost priority. Conflict as an opportunity: Every conflict has a scope of learning. Disagreements on ideas often result in potential scope for growth and development. It opens up new ideas for growing, diversifying and expanding the business opportunities. The divergent positions can lead to innovations and creativity, leading personal and organizational growth (Myatt 2012). Conclusion Workplace conflict exists in almost every organization. This is a situation, which cannot be avoided. However, the severity can be reduced if handled properly. Conflicts bring healthy competition among the employees and that pushes to company towards further growth. On the other hand, sometimes it results in wastage of time and resources and creates a bad image for the company. Efficient leadership and management policies can help in resolving and preventing conflicts in workplaces. Lastly, every organization should find out the learning scopes from the conflicts and must utilize the opportunities that results from the conflicts. References Demsky, C.A., Ellis, A.M. and Fritz, C., 2014. Shrugging it off: Does psychological detachment from work mediate the relationship between workplace aggression and work-family conflict?.Journal of occupational health psychology,19(2), p.195. Gilin Oore, D., Leiter, M.P. and LeBlanc, D.E., 2015. Individual and organizational factors promoting successful responses to workplace conflict.Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne,56(3), p.301. Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014.Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson. Katz, N.H. and Flynn, L.T., 2013. Understanding conflict management systems and strategies in the workplace: A pilot study.Conflict Resolution Quarterly,30(4), pp.393-410. Meier, L.L., Gross, S., Spector, P.E. and Semmer, N.K., 2013. Relationship and task conflict at work: Interactive short-term effects on angry mood and somatic complaints.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,18(2), p.144. Moore, C.W., 2014.The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. John Wiley Sons. Myatt, M., 2012.5 Keys of Dealing with Workplace Conflict. [online] Available at: [Accessed 9 Oct. 2017]. Sonnentag, S., Unger, D. and Ngel, I.J., 2013. Workplace conflict and employee well-being: The moderating role of detachment from work during off-job time.International Journal of Conflict Management,24(2), pp.166-183.